AI tools like ChatGPT have made their way into just about every facet of our lives, including debt relief. Plenty of business owners find themselves desperate for answers about their merchant cash advance (MCA) debt and lawsuits, and turn to ChatGPT for help.
It’s easy to see why AI tools are tempting. Legal services can be expensive, and AI may feel like a suitable free alternative at a time when you’re struggling with your finances. But AI legal advice comes with major risks and often provides incorrect information, which can lead to even deeper trouble.
If you’re tempted to turn to AI for legal help with your MCA debt, here are some of the risks of doing so, how AI differs from working with a real attorney, and why investing the money to hire a professional is probably the right choice for most people.
Why Business Owners Turn to AI for MCA Legal Help
When you’re overwhelmed by debt or facing a lawsuit, AI may feel like the fastest and easiest option. It’s available 24/7 and gives instant answers. Contrast that with an attorney or another professional, who may require lengthy intake forms, consultations, and retainers. For many business owners, AI feels like the less intimidating option. And when you’re in a panic, you’re likely to turn to the fastest solution.
In addition to being faster, ChatGPT is also cheaper. When you’re facing a large debt balance and rising fees, the last thing you want to do is spend money you can’t afford on an attorney. It’s easy to see why the free option looks so appealing to struggling business owners.
Additionally, being deep in debt or facing a debt lawsuit can create panic and lead to desperation. When you’re battling aggressive collection calls and rising fees, you’re likely to turn to the fastest solution and hope that AI can provide the answers you need.
But as you’ll learn in the next few sections, AI isn’t the answer for solving your debt problems, even if it doesn’t seem faster and cheaper.
ChatGPT and AI Are Pulling Back on Legal Advice
Recent Changes to AI Legal Guidance
If you’ve used AI recently, you may have noticed a shift. ChatGPT and other AI tools are limiting their legal advice and refusing to analyze legal documents. They may also give disclaimers on legal-related answers about how they can’t provide legal counsel, or simply redirect you to an attorney rather than giving direct answers.
When you hire an attorney, they have the legal education and training to best help you. But AI doesn’t have that, and providing incorrect legal advice can lead to major liability risks.
Why This Matters for You
These changes to ChatGPT’s policies on legal advice may seem frustrating to users, but it’s in your best interests. AI has been providing less reliable information than ever before, yet many people rely on it for nearly every aspect of their lives. With AI redirecting people to real legal professionals, hopefully, more people will turn to the pros rather than getting vague (or worse, blatantly incorrect) legal advice.
The Critical Risks of Using AI for MCA Legal Advice
Attorneys have seen the red flags with using AI for legal advice from the beginning, and it’s becoming clearer to the general population that it’s not a trustworthy tool to use for the most sensitive information or situations. Here are some of the key risks of using AI for legal advice:
- Generic, Not-Case-Specific Guidance: AI can’t analyze your specific MCA contract and doesn’t know the ins and outs of MCA laws from state to state. Rather than providing advice and information specifically related to your situation, it can only provide generic, one-size-fits-all answers that really don’t fit any situation.
- Potential For Misleading Advice: AI often “hallucinates” (meaning makes up) fake laws and cases. It may also cite outdated or incorrect legal standards. While AI’s hallucinations may seem relatively harmless in some situations, they could convince you to take legal advice that actually hurts your case.
- No Human Oversight or Accountability: When you use AI, there’s no one to verify the accuracy of the legal advice you’re getting. And unlike attorneys, AI has no professional license to lose, nor can it be held legally liable for bad advice. You alone bear the consequences if it provides you with bad advice that you take.
- Can’t Represent You or Take Legal Action: When you’re facing rising MCA debt, you could end up being sued or needing to sue your MCA lender. AI can’t negotiate with lenders, file documents with the court, or represent you in a lawsuit. It can give generic advice, but can’t actually implement any solutions.
Data Privacy and Security Concerns
Some of the biggest problems with AI, aside from the risk of inaccurate information, are the data privacy and security risks. To get the most in-depth legal advice from AI, you’d have to enter your case details, financial information, and debt contracts.
At this point, it’s still unclear just how secure your personal information is in AI. Your data could be stored, analyzed, or used by your AI company. And unlike a lawyer, there’s no attorney-client privilege protection when you’re using AI for your legal advice.
Why Attorney Advice Is Fundamentally Different
Working with an attorney differs from AI’s legal advice in many ways, but these are a few of the most important differences:
- Attorneys Analyze Your Specific Case: An attorney won’t give you generic advice. They’ll review your actual MCA contracts and court documents and give you advice and defenses that apply specifically to your unique situation.
- Professional Responsibility and Accountability: Licensed attorneys are bound by ethics rules and oversight from the state bar association. Attorney-client privilege protects your information, while malpractice insurance is there to cover any mistakes.
- Attorneys Take Action on Your Behalf: Attorneys don’t just give advice. They can also negotiate with MCA lenders, file court documents and legal responses, and represent you in court if your lender sues you. They implement actual solutions.
The Real Cost of “Free” AI Advice
Many people may be tempted to try using AI to solve their legal problems before turning to an attorney. After all, what’s the worst that can happen? In reality, you might be surprised to learn just how problematic AI advice can be.
Relying on AI for legal advice could result in:
- Missing critical deadlines based on wrong information
- Taking actions that waive your legal defenses
- Agreeing to terms you shouldn’t have accepted
- Costing far more to fix than hiring attorney upfront
Not only that, but turning to AI first can delay real help. You might temporarily think you understand your case when you really don’t. In the end, you end up waiting too long to get proper legal representation and losing leverage and options as time passes.
How Tayne Law Group Provides What AI Cannot
Unlike AI, Tayne Law Group can provide a personalized analysis of your MCA agreement and lawsuit. And based on our decades of experience, we can help you come up with a strategic defense. Meanwhile, AI can offer only generic information and advice.
Our attorneys can also help negotiate directly with your MCA lenders and offer accountability and professional responsibility. Finally, we’ll help protect your business and personal assets along the way.
Unlike AI, working with an attorney isn’t free, but we do offer free consultations to review your actual situation, explain how we can help you, and advise on the best next steps.
Conclusion
AI tools like ChatGPT may seem like a convenient, cost-free way to understand your MCA situation, but they’re dangerously unreliable for legal matters. When the information is generic, incomplete, or outright wrong, it can be dangerous for your business. And your business and financial future are too important for untested AI advice.
If you need help dealing with your MCA debt situation, don’t risk your case on AI. Contact Tayne Law Group today to set up your free consultation by calling (866) 890-7337 or filling out our short contact form to set up a consultation. We never share or sell your information, and all conversations are confidential.
